🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, star Jude Law remarked he had no concerns about backlash for playing Vladimir Putin in a cinematic adaptation. This production, however, could coincide too neatly with the mythologized image promoted by Russian state media that, domestically, it reads as a endorsement rather than a critique.

The Manufactured Superhero

For years, the Russian political apparatus and the country's pop-culture machine have worked together to craft a made-to-measure persona of the president. This figure is a political superhero without age or mistakes, a former spy reimagined as a local 007 who always knows beyond what he shows.

“Domestically, the manufactured Putin has long eclipsed the actual person.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

A notable instance is a television show released last October, directed by a pro-government filmmaker. Its main character is a invented blue-eyed lieutenant colonel inexplicably chosen to “save” Russia from disorder. Although he is called a different name, the message is unmistakable: the savior must be a known figure from the secret services.

Western portrayals frequently result in reinforcing this same narrative instead of debunking it. An adaptation inspired by a popular book sets out to undermine the Putin cult by framing him not as a cause but as a consequence, shifting the focus to the political machinery surrounding him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

In the film, Putin is shown as having been picked by powerful oligarchs to stabilise the country because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. The oligarchs approach him and practically plead him to become president. His response is that he would prefer to rule from the shadows, desiring enduring influence.

This tale is a key piece of state propaganda: the detached, unwilling mastermind guided by fate. In reality, none of this took place.

The Reality of the Casting Call

No one ever begged Putin to take the job. The position was in essence a casting call with many candidates. At the centre to this process stood an influential oligarch from the previous administration who planned to control the state in practice.

• The shortlist featured various figures, among them a reformer later murdered and a security service director.
• Per an expert who studied Putin’s biography, the future president merely met the necessary criteria: loyal, from the security services, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A businessman familiar with the events said the primary requirement was controllability and faithfulness, not strength.

“They didn’t need a powerful leader, they needed someone malleable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Analysts concur that the notion of him as a master operative was built after the fact. Claims about his “recruitment work” in Dresden fall apart under examination. Fundamentally, he handled paperwork and routine duties, a low-level clerk not engaged in actual agent work.

Interestingly, the move to depicting him as a “007” could partly have been inspired by the actor's arrival as 007. The grittier interpretation led local outlets and online audiences to make comparisons with Putin. Edited images replacing the actor's likeness with his surfaced on city centers, fueling the growing tendency to frame him as a local secret agent.

A Propaganda Win?

Given the casting, an actor well-liked by Russian audiences, the authorities are likely to seize the chance to frame his casting as a minor diplomatic triumph. The film's omission of public dissent, the political rivals, or key figures from its narrative, despite covering the past decade, is a pleasant bonus for state propaganda.

In Russian cinema, the president is frequently an all-powerful presence who remains unseen on screen. He is hinted at through photographs or orders from on high. In this new film, he at last gets a recognizable face—one that could unintentionally validate the very myths it perhaps aims to question.